Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111007
Uptime338.8 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 11:12
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 600e
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 67.2
31% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 129
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
XFX(1682 3143) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.9
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 65 41 69 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 34.4
Write 33.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 51
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback