Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac13,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FC02E91DDD3FA6A4
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 174
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 506
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX
Apple(106B 010D) 2GB
CLim: 719 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.24
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 31.5
21% 28.2 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 24.2
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD WDC WD10EALX-408EA0 1TB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 07.01D03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 47 37 41 55 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 65.7
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 44.7
46% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback