Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac13,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemApple iMac13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FC02E91DDD3FA6A4
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 208
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 519
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX
Apple(106B 010D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 306.37
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 25
Parallax 29.2
18% 25.6 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 22.8
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
488GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 168 164 164 172 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 165
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 92.8
Write 23
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 24.6
58% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.6
213% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback