Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A785-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A785-M  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 01:58
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B25
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 49
2-Core 98.1
51% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
XFX(1682 3250) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 41.3
32% 38.3 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 24.3
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 171 196 200 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 235
Write 226
Mixed 203
SusWrite 188
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 38.3
123% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 46.1
37% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62%
Great: 124%
ASMT 2115 2TB
325GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 23.7
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 24.4
32% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785-M Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback