Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 20:28
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 689
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 199
Parallax 210
146% 196 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 192
Splatting 130
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
78GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 353 183 124 113 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 487
Mixed 416
SusWrite 225
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 56.3
187% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
119GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 88 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 344
Write 143
Mixed 128
SusWrite 88.3
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 11
47% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 15
13% 21 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 56%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 483 146 88 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 353
Mixed 449
SusWrite 225
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 53.1
173% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 352
268% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
503GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 90 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 146
Write 127
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 90.1
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML16GX3M4A2133C1 CML8GX3M2A2133C11 CML16GX3M4A2133C1 CML8GX3M2A2133C11 CML16GX3M4A2133C1 CML8GX3M2A2133C11 CML16GX3M4A2133C1 CML8GX3M2A2133C11 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 48.6
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback