QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory23.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.8GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.3 GB free of 23.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 58.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 218
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 629
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 84.3
51% 69.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 46.8
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 397 396 395 376 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 453
Write 410
Mixed 387
SusWrite 386
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 30.9
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 253
194% 263 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 84%
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1471
Write 851
Mixed 1,318
919% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 20.7
3,925% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 88.4
804% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 96%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
210GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 176 178 172 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 154
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 175
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 99%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8000 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 26.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 23.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback