QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory17.7 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '22 at 21:26
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 287
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 947
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PRO W6600
AMD(1002 0E0C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q4
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 87
Reflection 117
Parallax 162
71% 122 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 85
Splatting 128
107% 133 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 275GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 712 847 1114 1428 1199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
248GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 600 750 706 709 693 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 7616 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 46.4
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 36.6
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback