QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 23:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,162
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 2,166
134% 2,166 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 66
Parallax 57.3
45% 59.5 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 53
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 327GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 395 393 398 398 398 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.5% Excellent
Read 455
Write 398
Mixed 402
SusWrite 396
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 37.5
122% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 182
136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 148 152 151 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 150
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
205% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 88 88 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 85.5
Write 76.7
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 86.8
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 3x16GB
3 of 3 slots used
48GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 39.2
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback