Gigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 M
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$285
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 933
93% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,043
65% 1,043 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 51.6
44% 54 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 30
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1421 1452 1079 1196 733 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,686
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,277
SusWrite 1,208
310% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53
183% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 574
564% 911 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 246%
Great: 334%
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
98GB free
Firmware: H201230a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 53 53 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 425
Write 402
Mixed 360
SusWrite 90.1
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 30
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 195
155% 210 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 170 175 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 167
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 164
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 43 38 41 41 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 127
Write 64.6
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 37
84% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.5
76% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2328WS.001 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 M-CF Builds (Compare 1,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 M-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback