Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 21 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration	333 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 66.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 176 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 563 53% 438 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.5% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 55.6 Parallax 51.8 44% 53.9 fps	MRender 41.6 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 49.3 39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 46%
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 21 12% 16.6 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 13.7 11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 146 132 164 123 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 696 Write 296 Mixed 332 SusWrite 146 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 50.9 163% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 622 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 357 298% 438 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 187%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 325 333 341 342 327 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 378 Write 338 Mixed 328 SusWrite 330 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 31.1 102% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 190 145% 196 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 302GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 109 107 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 70 Write 110 Mixed 51.4 SusWrite 109 62% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 181% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 26.9 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,840x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	981x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,363x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	949x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,159x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	407x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	589x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	136x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16