Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	45.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 22:50
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 82.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 293 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 582 8-Core 958 94% 770 Pts	64-Core 1,553 96% 1,553 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 28.1 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 24 23% 27.3 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 16.6 20% 26 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 1127 1111 1076 1046 1012 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,140 Write 1523 Mixed 1,135 SusWrite 1,097 328% 1,474 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 64.3 214% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,247 DQ Write 932 DQ Mixed 1,055 798% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 393%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$97 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 108GB free Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 784 782 803 803 804 789 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,828 Write 801 Mixed 744 SusWrite 794 230% 1,042 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 40.8 143% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 568 DQ Write 827 DQ Mixed 645 503% 680 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 2,983 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.1 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 18.7 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 131%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16