Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 02:36
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$440
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 874
81% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,148
77% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 9.2
6% 9.2 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.3
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 2220 2220 1920 1543 1396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,711
Write 1,602
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 1,920
373% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 79.4
276% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 441
416% 662 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 305%
Great: 405%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 213 212 212 214 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$8
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7.1 7.2 8.6 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 83.6
Write 35.3
SusWrite 9
42% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 29%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback