Today's hottest deals

Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 692
73% 582 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 103
Parallax 94.3
84% 100 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 63.3
66% 83.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 575 463 447 493 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 963
Write 1,231
Mixed 1,168
SusWrite 514
219% 969 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 55.3
178% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 842
638% 864 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 164%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS88A-26N1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.2
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 357 298 144 16" 1536 864 CMN1602
Typical P9XXEN_EF_ED Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback