Today's hottest deals

Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 367
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 75
Parallax 66.3
55% 69.4 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 59.4
57% 72.1 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 348 365 338 356 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 570
Write 693
Mixed 276
SusWrite 351
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 26.2
72% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 340
400% 698 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 222%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 52 68 42 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 110
Write 127
Mixed 44
SusWrite 56.2
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.2
162% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS88A-26N1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9XXEN_EF_ED Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P9XXEN_EF_ED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback