Today's hottest deals

Nvidia NM46X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardNvidia NM46X  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090216
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 07:28
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2214 HE
CPU0-Socket F, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 64.4
37% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 93.3
8-Core 90.2
12% 91.8 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725025VLA 250GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 44 45 48 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 49.2
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 46.9
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 35%
Amcc 9650SE-12ML 250GB
131GB free
Firmware: 3.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 85 66 86 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Read 90.7
Write 50.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 80.1
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Amcc 9650SE-12ML 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 3.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.2 5 6.1 5.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 125
Write 37.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 5.9
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.67 MB/s
Amcc 9650SE-12ML 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 3.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
Read 108
Write 5.2
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 1.9
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
95% 0.63 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 64 0" 1024 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback