Nvidia NM46X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardNvidia NM46X  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 20:22
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2214 HE
CPU0-Socket F, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 59.3
30% 46 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 103
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8421) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 31
16% 24.8 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 26.3
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpekkf256g8 NVMe INTEL 256GB
89GB free
Firmware: D05N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 176 228 266 275 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 365
Write 440
Mixed 415
SusWrite 248
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 36.1
116% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 202
158% 221 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 57 65 63 67 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 71
Write 75.6
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 64.1
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
149GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 76 82 86 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 87.6
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 79.2
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
59GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 75 81 80 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44% Average
Read 77.8
Write 68.4
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 75.2
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
145GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 79 84 88 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 86
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 80.4
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback