Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-S  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 75.1
37% 58 Pts
4-Core 76.7
8-Core 77
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 76.2
5% 76.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E104) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 8
9% 9.9 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725025VLA 250GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5DO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 20 23 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 12.9
Write 22.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 23.4
14% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback