Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-C R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 08:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 438
59% 440 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 20.9
12% 16.6 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 565 223 216 219 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,139
Write 1,053
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 399
204% 911 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 71.5
251% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 806
636% 874 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 188%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 16.6" 1280 720 CNC0320 Digital
Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback