Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 13:49
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$215
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,205
108% 910 Pts
64-Core 2,246
139% 2,246 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 211
Parallax 205
189% 216 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
140% 178 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 236 224 225 222 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 301
Mixed 329
SusWrite 230
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 48.3
170% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
901GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2367 2167 1177 1176 1179 1178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 2,385
Mixed 1,719
SusWrite 1,541
456% 2,034 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.6
295% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,446
DQ Write 1,298
DQ Mixed 1,363
1,025% 1,369 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 346%
Great: 372%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
739GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3277 3268 3233 2482 1554 1551 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
454% Outstanding
Read 2,948
Write 3,320
Mixed 3,010
SusWrite 2,561
668% 2,960 MB/s
4K Read 81.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 117
380% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,446
DQ Write 1,277
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,020% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 454%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
754GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3190 3250 3207 2525 1526 1519 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,907
Write 3,255
Mixed 3,010
SusWrite 2,536
661% 2,927 MB/s
4K Read 80.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 110
359% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1,296
DQ Mixed 1,375
1,031% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 444%
Great: 477%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
45GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 11.3
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 11.1
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
103% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 43.8
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 41.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27.8" 1280 720 GBT2701 AORUS AD27QD
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback