Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration	374 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 80.6 1-Core 155 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 1,028 94% 788 Pts	64-Core 1,468 91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 58.8 Reflection 61.1 Parallax 80.2 48% 66.7 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 44.9 45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2316 782 779 785 788 782 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	329% Outstanding	Read 2,697 Write 2,516 Mixed 1,910 SusWrite 1,039 457% 2,040 MB/s	4K Read 71 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 97.8 328% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,386 DQ Write 1,140 DQ Mixed 1,251 940% 1259 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 329% Great: 355%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 466GB free Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1208 423 418 410 410 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,074 Write 1,270 Mixed 1,146 SusWrite 691 236% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 76.6 271% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1246 DQ Write 1,174 DQ Mixed 1,258 931% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 253%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 466GB free Firmware: 415020RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 210 208 209 212 208 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 485 Mixed 362 SusWrite 241 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 52.7 186% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 256 219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 115%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 466GB free Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 448 440 441 441 441 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 491 Mixed 409 SusWrite 450 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 54.2 191% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 263 224% 329 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 115%
Emtec X200 256GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 238GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 183 173 169 168 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 351 Write 356 Mixed 308 SusWrite 199 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 33.7 124% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 56.4 70% 120 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 931GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 376 371 371 371 370 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 392 Write 377 Mixed 283 SusWrite 372 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 40.1 133% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 130 120% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 87%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 466GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.1% Poor	Read 41.9 Write 38.1 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 38.5 9% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 14.2 48% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 28.5 DQ Mixed 26.1 20% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 157 156 155 156 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 143 Write 146 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 156 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 194 196 196 184 194 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 130 Write 105 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 185 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 35.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 36.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	262x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $139Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	202x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	180x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	39x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)