Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 04:14
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 182 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 259 35% 259 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 19.6 18% 19.7 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 16.5 Splatting 9.6 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 36 67 12 65 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 410 Write 345 Mixed 313 SusWrite 90.7 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 1.1 42% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 11.3 DQ Mixed 17.6 42% 94 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 282GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 37 38 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 24.1 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 37.9 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0710 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 88.8 Write 114 Mixed 85.7 72% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.1 161% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA HDWG180 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.93% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 26.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 1.4 23% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 60%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 367GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 34.9 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 1.4 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 275GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.51% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 17 SusWrite 1.2 17% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.51% Great: 70%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 186GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 34 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 36 Write 34.7 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 35.6 47% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	379x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	253x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	192x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	276x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	177x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	104x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	71x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	87x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16