Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 437
59% 440 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 14
Parallax 21.8
12% 16.7 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.6
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 345 395 221 556 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 2116
Write 1,235
Mixed 531
SusWrite 442
238% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 35.6
115% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 165
169% 292 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 163%
Great: 311%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 83 31 83 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 487
Write 321
Mixed 249
SusWrite 81.1
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 6.2
44% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 117
114% 191 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 114%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
51GB free
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 202 164 208 187 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 487
Write 210
Mixed 230
SusWrite 188
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 22.7
86% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 128
106% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 84%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-75GXCB0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 32 33 34 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 33.8
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 32.6
46% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 64%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-75GXCB0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 34.3
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 0.1
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 64%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-75GXCB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.4 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 28.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 4.3
32% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 33.6
Write 37.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 0.1
31% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
252% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback