HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 190
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 298
41% 303 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 9.2
5% 6.43 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.1
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 21 42 74 83 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 86.7
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 58.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 71%
Kindle Internal Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 1.6
4% 3.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
12% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bs0xx Builds (Compare 3,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback