Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory30.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 04:08
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 43.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 226
71% 135 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 794
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,853
115% 1,853 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 278 244 258 249 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70% Good
Read 377
Write 290
Mixed 373
SusWrite 261
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 27.6
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 190
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 109%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
890GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 690 586 618 587 615 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 772
Write 607
Mixed 225
SusWrite 617
124% 555 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 8.1
50% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 738
531% 701 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 113%
Great: 500%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
707GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 605 659 564 640 634 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 760
Mixed 513
SusWrite 625
160% 717 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 32.9
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,360
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 529
456% 706 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 140%
Great: 500%
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA4000GM10001 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: SU0SC013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 170 202 219 193 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 56.6
Write 201
Mixed 292
SusWrite 208
44% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 32.9
98% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 169
124% 161 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 53%
Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
1GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.8
Write 100
Mixed 54.9
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
34GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 110 112 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 57.6
Write 59.8
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 109
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
145% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
28GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 78 78 78 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 92.4
Write 120
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 74.9
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 200 200 202 202 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 150
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 201
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 179 180 181 188 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 153
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 185
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
414% 3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 107%
Great: 90%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 165 172 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 201
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 168
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback