Asrock B550M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory40.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 346
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,166
112% 925 Pts
64-Core 2,764
171% 2,764 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 65.1
57% 69.4 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 57.5
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 286
Write 1,190
Mixed 287
134% 588 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 9.6
50% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 538
413% 570 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 250%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
639GB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 118
Mixed 77.7
74% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
202% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 40.1
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 36.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback