Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141 4,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 119 56% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 335 35% 279 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 1571) 1.2GB CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.01 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2TB 924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 176 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 1 33% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 135%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2TB 924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 67.2 Write 1.3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 1.2 13% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.5 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $351

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16