Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '17 at 17:35
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770T
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770T CPU @ 2.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 177
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 425
47% 373 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 5.16
5% 6.59 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6
6% 7.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R3sl120g R3SL120G 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P042 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 497
Write 205
Mixed 238
68% 313 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 20.3
88% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 46
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
909GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 183
Mixed 152
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.35
138% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
461GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 85.1
66% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.31
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
290GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 113
Write 128
Mixed 90.8
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 105%
TOSHIBA MK7575GSX 750GB
302GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 17.8
30% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.22
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback