Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 08:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 193
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 598
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.3% Very good
Lighting 93.8
Reflection 154
Parallax 97.2
76% 115 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 81.5
73% 90.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00007 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2306Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 312 301 306 302 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 462
Mixed 404
SusWrite 315
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 43.8
147% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 116%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 179 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 135
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 181
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback