Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 185 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 418 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.2% Very good	Lighting 83.9 Reflection 93.7 Parallax 84.8 68% 87.5 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 76.6 Splatting 78 74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 144 136 193 195 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 852 Write 170 Mixed 174 SusWrite 167 74% 341 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 37.1 139% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 840 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 218 237% 416 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 228%
Jmicron Tech 480GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 330GB free Firmware: 0407 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 272 320 266 322 271 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 171 Write 96.8 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 296 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 9 35% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 87.4 54% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 21.3 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,063x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,071x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,448x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	597x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,758x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16