Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	16.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 01:00
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$272 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 83.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 294 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 944 90% 745 Pts	64-Core 984 61% 984 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.1% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 61.8 Parallax 88.6 54% 72.3 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 46 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA17.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 366 Write 308 Mixed 303 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 34 128% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 216 184% 269 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 626GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 4942 Write 43.5 Mixed 68.7 1,206% 1,685 MB/s	4K Read 526 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 21,956% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
hp v210w 4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 5607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 19.7 Write 7.5 Mixed 5.5 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 6GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 65.3 Write 19.5 Mixed 25 38% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 48GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.5% Good	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 22 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	684x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	580x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	483x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	385x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	247x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $813

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16