Amazon m5zn.metal

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon m5zn.metal  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon Not Specified
Memory69.5 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.9 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 15:17
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 904
88% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,911
118% 1,911 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Starwind RAM DISK 21GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,566
Write 6,576
Mixed 3,078
924% 4,073 MB/s
4K Read 830
4K Write 895
4K Mixed 840
2,809% 855 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,725
DQ Mixed 1,872
1,400% 1,864 MB/s
Starwind RAM DISK 12GB
11GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,159
Write 3,735
Mixed 2,959
736% 3,284 MB/s
4K Read 1,008
4K Write 923
4K Mixed 937
3,217% 956 MB/s
DQ Read 2,061
DQ Write 1,798
DQ Mixed 1958
1,460% 1,939 MB/s
Starwind RAM DISK 64GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,067
Write 3,272
Mixed 2,809
682% 3049 MB/s
4K Read 946
4K Write 914
4K Mixed 971
3,161% 944 MB/s
DQ Read 2,074
DQ Write 1,829
DQ Mixed 1,972
1,473% 1,958 MB/s
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 1TB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 224 219 223 227 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB3-CVF 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 50.7
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback