Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL 15 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 241 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 922 82% 696 Pts	64-Core 3,226 200% 3,226 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 86%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 54GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26% Poor	Read 130 Write 190 Mixed 137 SusWrite 130 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 10.2 43% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 292%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB3-CVF 12x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 12 of 24 slots used 192GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	MC Read 69.4 MC Write 86 MC Mixed 64.4 209% 73.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 172%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	0	0"	1280 701

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16