Lenovo 43532G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 43532G5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory249.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 53.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 635
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 299
Reflection 241
Parallax 312
244% 284 fps
MRender 349
Gravity 251
Splatting 185
205% 262 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDLF1DAM-400G-1J 400GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RE41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 335 342 346 337 289 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
Read 302
Write 317
Mixed 298
SusWrite 327
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 31.8
108% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 206
168% 239 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 400GB
109GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 315 321 317 319 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 493
Write 367
Mixed 292
SusWrite 307
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 25.5
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 161
132% 185 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 244%
VK0240GDJXU 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 201 201 197 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 224
Write 235
Mixed 194
SusWrite 194
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 31
120% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 186
138% 183 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
179GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 198 199 199 195 166 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.7% Very good
Read 248
Write 238
Mixed 230
SusWrite 192
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 48.7
157% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
40GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 70 70 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 67.6
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70... 256GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 38.6
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43532G5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 43532G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback