Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A2
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '22 at 09:53
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 47.9 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 188 57% 107 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 746 68% 570 Pts	64-Core 1,990 123% 1,990 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Lighting 24.4 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 32.2 20% 27.9 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 24 24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: N102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 217 218 217 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.5% Average	Read 226 Write 214 Mixed 216 SusWrite 217 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 21.1 65% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 148 112% 150 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 106%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$33 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: 1S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 132 132 132 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 131 Write 125 Mixed 100 SusWrite 131 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 21.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R930power Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930power

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	1x

GPU
GTX TitanNvidia $1,088Bench 47%, 6,806 samples	2x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	2x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	1x
THNSNH512GCST 512GBToshibaBench 81%, 323 samples	1x
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A M391B5273DH... 64GBSamsungBench 83%, 2 samples	2x
HMT41GR7AFR8C 4x8GBHynixBench 90%, 43 samples	1x
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $1,313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350