Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191012
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 23:59
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 645
71% 560 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 31.6
30% 37.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 26.8
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1101 512GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10120001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 716 359 353 340 330 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 1,398
Mixed 1212
SusWrite 404
264% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 59.5
216% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 984
736% 983 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 203%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback