Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 78 44% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 146 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.5% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 90.4 Parallax 85.6 87% 94.4 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 83.3 Splatting 86 79% 98.6 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 328 358 391 377 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 76GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 58 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 57.1 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 56.8 43% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 932GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 82 82 83 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 83.2 122% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 F3-12800CL7-2GBRM0 8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16