Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-P PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-P PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 01:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770TE
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 154
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 327
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.7
2% 3.67 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 98 96 81 79 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 463
Write 442
Mixed 323
SusWrite 129
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 40
129% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 138
110% 159 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
655GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 129 140 148 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 151
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 142
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
0GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.2
Write 6.3
Mixed 14
16% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P PLUS Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback