Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 00:15
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 603
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 8429) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.25
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 20.9
18% 23.7 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 21
Splatting 21.7
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 861 708 725 709 721 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 1,104
Mixed 973
SusWrite 763
230% 1,026 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 362
285% 395 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 152%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 15.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback