Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '20 at 23:08
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 70 2-Core 132 61% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 373 38% 306 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% PowerColor(148C 2391) CLim: 1561 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.3 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62% Good	Lighting 80.5 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 114 66% 70.2 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 85.7 Splatting 53.4 55% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 166 61 117 55 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 419 Write 388 Mixed 96 SusWrite 112 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1.1 6% 3.3 MB/s	DQ Read 51.2 DQ Write 11.9 DQ Mixed 11.2 14% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 90%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 179GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 223 176 76 42 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 473 Write 404 Mixed 406 SusWrite 155 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 27.8 115% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 48.7 86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 285GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 138 137 140 137 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 122 Write 142 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 136 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 107%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 77GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 58 58 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 76 Write 36 Mixed 51 SusWrite 58.1 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 59%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 714GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 118 117 116 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 175 Write 150 Mixed 30 SusWrite 116 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 108%
Intenso Rainbow Line 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 0817 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.7 1% 0.68 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 12% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 7%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 931GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 127 125 128 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 118 Write 124 Mixed 66 SusWrite 125 146% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 107% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	193x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	191x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16