Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 63.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 256 80% 150 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 404 60% 435 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 10.2 7% 9.53 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 9.4 8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 51 33 39 34 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 438 Write 277 Mixed 279 SusWrite 54.9 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 15.5 77% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 92.6 DQ Mixed 29.9 42% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 324GB free Firmware: 13057113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 132 127 131 133 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 155 Write 141 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 130 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.3% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 22.8 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 20 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	207x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	163x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $353

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16