MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190904
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '20 at 14:13
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$141 175,323 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 221 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 509 61% 462 Pts	64-Core 602 40% 602 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 82,730 User benchmarks, average bench 153% Palit(1569 2484) ≥ 4GB; palit CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	137% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 182 Parallax 175 156% 183 fps	MRender 171 Gravity 138 Splatting 122 115% 144 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 166%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$53 120,441 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 35 38 19 39 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 106 Write 86.5 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 29.1 17% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 9.5 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 13.6 10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 104%
Kingston A400 240GB-$32 271,645 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 141 Write 94.6 Mixed 83.2 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 10 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 16.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 5,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $94Bench 81%, 60,677 samples	1,972x
Core i5-9400FIntel $141Bench 87%, 175,323 samples	1,526x
Core i3-8100Intel $124Bench 77%, 94,028 samples	202x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 84,344 samples	445x
RX 570AMD $125Bench 47%, 296,565 samples	428x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $170Bench 60%, 73,712 samples	331x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 271,645 samples	418x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $37Bench 46%, 108,048 samples	214x
A400 480GBKingston $53Bench 77%, 120,441 samples	201x

RAM
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 23,710 samples	207x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 81%, 79,547 samples	140x
1x8GBUnknownBench 31%, 116,330 samples	139x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16