MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190904
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '20 at 14:13
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 244 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 579 64% 505 Pts	64-Core 653 40% 653 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Palit(1569 2484) ≥ 4GB; palit CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	134% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 182 Parallax 175 157% 183 fps	MRender 171 Gravity 138 Splatting 122 115% 144 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 35 38 19 39 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 106 Write 86.5 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 29.1 17% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 9.5 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 13.6 10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 141 Write 94.6 Mixed 83.2 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 10 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 16.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,316x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,505x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	291x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	636x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	463x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	357x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	283x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	206x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	164x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16