Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 17:29
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 865
78% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 99
78% 100 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 92.1
Splatting 96.1
78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 415 410 409 403 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 1,550
Mixed 685
SusWrite 456
252% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 49.5
177% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 581
428% 568 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 181%
Great: 254%
Amd-raid OCZ-VERTEX4 128GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 79 73 75 74 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 289
Write 220
Mixed 244
SusWrite 82.3
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.7
35% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 80
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 84.2
92% 148 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid SanDisk S24 240GB
178GB free
Firmware: Z331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 88 79 79 89 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 310
Write 164
Mixed 232
SusWrite 87.3
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 7.5
34% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 13.6
37% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 67%
Amd-raid Array 3 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 148 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 116
Write 144
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 148
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback