Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 07:02
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 124 2-Core 250 89% 157 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 814 80% 656 Pts	64-Core 944 58% 944 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1525 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 76.8 Parallax 113 70% 91.7 fps	MRender 75.7 Gravity 82.7 Splatting 63.1 59% 73.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L5B0B 512GB 990 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80740C10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,597 Write 1,452 Mixed 647 273% 1,232 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 53.3 182% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 584 DQ Write 438 DQ Mixed 547 399% 523 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 225%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 169GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 88 88 87 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 366 Write 164 Mixed 216 SusWrite 88.3 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 37.5 122% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 159 122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 129%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 88GB free Firmware: 4L7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 523 331 332 330 326 322 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,504 Write 1,355 Mixed 1,003 SusWrite 361 236% 1,056 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 70 231% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 600 DQ Write 487 DQ Mixed 537 404% 541 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 236%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 282GB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 86 87 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 85.4 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-13-13 D3-240 4x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 54.6 MC Write 53.9 MC Mixed 51.9 153% 53.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 50.5 79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	544x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	391x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	99x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	85x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369