Today's hottest deals

EVGA 132-CK-NF78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF78  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9505-$250
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 63.8
32% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 132
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 093C) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 9.22
7% 8.55 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 11.2
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 48 0GB SSD
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 135 161 187 193 191 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 143
Write 139
Mixed 138
SusWrite 163
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 8.5
31% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 20.9
24% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 171
24% 171 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-CK-NF78 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback