Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 16 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 41.4 32% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 40.9 5% 40.9 Pts	64-Core 40.5 2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8490) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.09 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 33 15 19 75 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 17.2 Write 61.2 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 48.8 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 328GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 91 96 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 81.9 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 93.7 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	63x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	24x

GPU
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	15x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	15x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	7x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	6x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128