| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A960D+V3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180110 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 24 '20 at 22:58 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 60% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.2%
Below average
|
38% 53.3 Pts
|
7% 54.6 Pts
|
6% 96.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.4%
Poor
|
24% 25.2 fps
|
23% 28.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 118 125 121 106 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
28% 125 MB/s
|
45% 14.4 MB/s
|
24% 33.8 MB/s
|
|
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
315GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 96 100 100 112 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
58% 78.7 MB/s
|
142% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Atermiter X.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
20.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.4 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
30% 131 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 97 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 25x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 14x |
| R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $255 |