Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 55.1 2-Core 112 52% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 231 27% 208 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.9% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 49.3 Parallax 86 42% 62.1 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 53.8 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 136 120 130 130 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 328 Write 181 Mixed 242 SusWrite 131 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 27.8 93% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 177 141% 198 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 221GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 100 100 102 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 103 Write 110 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 95.7 62% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 107%
Memorex Mini 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 060b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9.2 9.3 9.1 9.3 9.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.57% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 9 Mixed 11 SusWrite 9.1 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.57% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 16.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 11.3 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16