Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 136
53% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 441
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
MSI(1462 2508) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 6.94
6% 7.11 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 5.35
4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 7%
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.66 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 283 295 309 296 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 363
Write 283
Mixed 191
SusWrite 296
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 8.3
62% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 10.6
23% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 78%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
160GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 26.5
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 14.6
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HDS721616PLAT80 165GB
73GB free
Firmware: P22O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 27.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 14.6
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 40%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
156GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 73 73 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.5
Write 60.1
Mixed 39
SusWrite 72.4
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 51%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 17.5
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 104%
WDC WD15 EADS-11R6B1 1.5TB
222GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 14.3
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600LL Series Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 1600LL Series Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $769
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback