Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:50
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 256
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 796
78% 641 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.8
88% 105 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 98.8
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
192GB free
Firmware: X3540000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
192GB free
Firmware: X3540000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 97%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47% Average
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 124
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 13.6
87% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 39.5
53% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
803GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 103
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.56
128% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
WDC WD15 EARS-32MVWB0 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 68.6
123% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.18
83% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%
WDC WD15 EARS-32MVWB0 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 78.9
130% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.17
76% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
ST375064 0AS 750GB
698GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 70.8
Write 72.4
Mixed 53.6
83% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.37
56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 31%
ST375064 0AS 750GB
698GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 69.8
Write 58.4
Mixed 27
61% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.35
46% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 31%
WDC WD10 JPVT-22A1YT0 1TB
106GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 34.1
Mixed 27.1
40% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.16
74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback