Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6567U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 176
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 215
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
8.98% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 0.06
8% 5.98 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 15
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.98%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 3.7 6.4 15 19 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 363
Write 306
Mixed 262
SusWrite 66.5
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 10
43% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 63.7
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 33.8
36% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
524GB free
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 62.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 65.3
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 17.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WQ Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback